Artículo 8 feb, 12:01

The Man Who Invented the Future — Then Watched It Come True

On February 8, 1828, in the port city of Nantes, a boy was born who would grow up to predict submarines, helicopters, video calls, and space travel — all without a single engineering degree. Jules Verne didn't just write science fiction. He wrote the blueprint for the twentieth century, and the engineers who built it openly admitted they were copying his homework.

Today marks 198 years since Verne's birth, and here's the uncomfortable truth: we still haven't caught up with everything he imagined. But let's start at the beginning, because the origin story is almost too perfect.

Picture this: young Jules, age eleven, sneaks aboard a merchant ship bound for the Indies. He wants adventure so badly he can taste the salt air. His father, a respectable Nantes lawyer named Pierre Verne, catches him at the last port before open ocean and drags him home by the ear. According to family legend, the boy promised his furious father that from then on, he would "travel only in his imagination." Most kids break promises like that within a week. Verne kept his for the rest of his life — and his imaginary travels turned out to be more accurate than most real expeditions.

Here's where it gets wild. Verne's father wanted him to be a lawyer. Jules dutifully went to Paris to study law, passed his exams, and then did what every sensible person does with a law degree — absolutely nothing related to law. He fell in with the literary crowd, befriended Alexandre Dumas (yes, that Dumas, the Three Musketeers guy), and started writing plays that nobody watched. For nearly a decade, Verne was what we'd today call a struggling creative. He worked as a stockbroker to pay the bills. A stockbroker! The man who would invent science fiction spent his twenties doing spreadsheets. Let that sink in next time you feel like your day job is killing your creativity.

The turning point came in 1862 when Verne met publisher Pierre-Jules Hetzel. Verne handed him a manuscript about balloon travel across Africa. Hetzel saw something nobody else had — a writer who could make science thrilling. He signed Verne to an extraordinary contract: two novels per year for twenty years. That's the kind of deal that would make any modern author weep with a mixture of joy and terror. And Verne delivered. Oh, how he delivered.

Let's talk about the big three, because they deserve it. "Journey to the Center of the Earth" (1864) took readers through volcanic tubes into a prehistoric underground world. Absurd? Sure. But Verne packed it with so much real geology and mineralogy that actual scientists wrote him letters debating his theories. "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" (1870) gave us Captain Nemo and the Nautilus — a fully electric submarine at a time when real submarines were little more than leaky coffins with hand-cranked propellers. Verne described the Nautilus with such engineering precision that Simon Lake, who built the first successful modern submarine, wrote in his autobiography: "Jules Verne was in a sense the director-general of my life." Let me repeat that. A real submarine inventor credited a novelist as his life's guiding force. That's not literature — that's witchcraft.

Then came "Around the World in Eighty Days" (1873), and this is where Verne proved he was also a marketing genius. The novel was serialized in newspapers, and readers became so obsessed with whether Phileas Fogg would make it in time that they placed actual bets. Gambling houses across Europe set odds on a fictional character's travel schedule. Six years later, journalist Nellie Bly decided to do it for real, completing the journey in 72 days. She stopped in Amiens to visit Verne on her way. He was reportedly delighted and slightly jealous.

But here's what most people miss about Verne, and it's the thing that makes him genuinely terrifying as a prophet. He didn't just predict technology — he predicted the moral problems that would come with it. Captain Nemo isn't Tony Stark. He's a traumatized anti-imperialist who uses his technological superiority to wage a one-man war against colonial powers. In "The Begum's Fortune" (1879), Verne described a weapon of mass destruction — a giant cannon firing poisonous gas shells — decades before World War I made chemical warfare a horrifying reality. His unpublished novel "Paris in the Twentieth Century," written in 1863 but rejected by Hetzel as too depressing, described a future city with glass skyscrapers, high-speed trains, gas-powered automobiles, a worldwide communications network, and a society so obsessed with technology and commerce that art and literature had withered to nothing. Sound familiar? The manuscript was found in a safe in 1989, and when it was finally published in 1994, critics were speechless.

Verne wrote 54 novels in his "Extraordinary Voyages" series. He is the second most translated author in the world, right behind Agatha Christie. He outsells most living authors while being dead for 120 years. His work has been adapted into over 200 films. And yet, for decades, the French literary establishment treated him as a children's writer, unworthy of serious consideration. The Académie Française never admitted him. Critics dismissed him as a mere popularizer of science. It took until the late twentieth century for scholars to recognize what readers had known all along: Verne wasn't just entertaining — he was reshaping how humanity imagined its own future.

There's a melancholy footnote to this story. In 1886, Verne's nephew Gaston, who suffered from mental illness, shot him in the leg. Verne was left with a permanent limp and became increasingly reclusive. His later novels grew darker — less adventure, more pessimism about where technology was taking humanity. He served on the municipal council of Amiens, the quiet provincial city where he'd settled with his wife Honorine, and died there on March 24, 1905. Twenty thousand people attended his funeral. His gravestone in Amiens shows him bursting from his tomb, reaching toward the sky. It's the most on-brand gravestone in literary history.

So, 198 years later, what do we do with Jules Verne? We can start by admitting something slightly humbling: a nineteenth-century Frenchman with no formal scientific training, working by candlelight with ink and paper, imagined our world more accurately than most futurists with supercomputers. He didn't predict the future because he was a genius — although he was. He predicted it because he understood something fundamental about human nature: give us a tool, and we will use it. For wonder. For war. For profit. For escape. Every technology Verne imagined came wrapped in a story about what it would cost us to use it.

The next time someone tells you that fiction doesn't matter, that novels are just entertainment, that stories can't change the real world — point them to the submarine. Point them to the moon landing. Point them to the fact that NASA engineers kept dog-eared copies of Verne on their desks. Then remind them that the most powerful technology humanity ever developed wasn't the rocket or the submarine. It was the story. And nobody understood that better than the boy from Nantes who promised his father he'd only travel in his imagination.

1x

Comentarios (0)

Sin comentarios todavía

Registrate para dejar comentarios

Lee También

Arthur Miller Died 21 Years Ago — And America Still Can't Handle His Mirror
22 minutes hace

Arthur Miller Died 21 Years Ago — And America Still Can't Handle His Mirror

Arthur Miller didn't write plays. He built traps. Elaborate, beautiful, devastating traps designed to lure audiences in with the promise of drama and then force them to stare at themselves until it hurt. Twenty-one years after his death on February 10, 2005, those traps still work perfectly — maybe even better than when he set them. Here's what's genuinely unsettling: every single "dated" Miller play keeps becoming more relevant. Death of a Salesman was supposed to be about postwar delusion. The Crucible was supposed to be about McCarthyism. All My Sons was supposed to be about wartime profiteering. None of them stayed in their lanes.

0
0
Iris Murdoch Saw Through Us All — And We Still Haven't Caught Up
about 2 hours hace

Iris Murdoch Saw Through Us All — And We Still Haven't Caught Up

Twenty-seven years ago today, Iris Murdoch died — a woman who had already lost herself to Alzheimer's before the world lost her. The cruel irony is almost too novelistic: the philosopher who spent her life dissecting the ways humans deceive themselves was robbed of the very mind that did the dissecting. But here's the thing that should unsettle you: her novels are more disturbingly accurate about human nature now than they were when she wrote them.

0
0
The Man Who Put His Face on Money by Writing from a Cat's Perspective
about 2 hours hace

The Man Who Put His Face on Money by Writing from a Cat's Perspective

Imagine telling your bank that the guy on the thousand-yen bill got famous by pretending to be a cat. That's Natsume Soseki for you — a man so brilliantly neurotic that Japan decided to immortalize him on currency. Born 159 years ago today, on February 9, 1867, in Tokyo, Soseki went from being an unwanted child literally given away by his parents to becoming the most important novelist in Japanese history. Not bad for someone who spent two years in London being absolutely miserable.

0
0
AI Writing Assistants: A New Era of Creativity — How Technology Is Reshaping the Way We Tell Stories
about 2 hours hace

AI Writing Assistants: A New Era of Creativity — How Technology Is Reshaping the Way We Tell Stories

There was a time when the blank page was every writer's greatest enemy. The cursor blinked, the clock ticked, and inspiration refused to arrive. Today, artificial intelligence has quietly stepped into the writer's studio — not as a replacement, but as an unlikely creative partner. Whether you're a novelist wrestling with a tangled plot, a blogger searching for the right hook, or a first-time author who has always dreamed of finishing a book, AI writing assistants are opening doors that used to feel permanently locked. But let's be honest: the conversation around AI and creativity is clouded by hype, fear, and misunderstanding. Some people imagine robots churning out soulless bestsellers. Others dismiss the technology entirely, convinced it can only produce generic filler. The truth, as usual, lives somewhere in the middle — and it's far more interesting than either extreme.

0
0
The Competence Lullaby: Let Routine Mastery Precede Catastrophe
about 3 hours hace

The Competence Lullaby: Let Routine Mastery Precede Catastrophe

Before disaster strikes your character, show them performing a familiar task with effortless skill. A surgeon humming while stitching a routine wound, a pilot casually adjusting instruments during calm flight. This mundane competence creates a contract with the reader: this person has control. When catastrophe arrives seconds later, the contrast is devastating—not because the character is weak, but because we witnessed their strength, and it wasn't enough. This works because readers calibrate danger against demonstrated ability. Watching someone perform their craft beautifully—then watching that craft fail them—creates a dread no foreshadowing can match. The reader doesn't just fear for the character; they grieve for competence that became irrelevant. Use sparingly: once before a major turning point, perhaps twice in a novel. The lullaby of routine is most powerful when the reader forgets they're being lulled.

0
0

"Todo lo que haces es sentarte y sangrar." — Ernest Hemingway